Gibril Diarra vs Matteo Fago Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L W L L L W W L L L
Form
W W L W W L W L W LHead-2-Head: Diarra 3 - 0 Fago
They have played 7 sets in total, with Diarra winning 6 and Fago winning 1. The last match between Diarra and Fago was at the Italy F12, 28-04-2014, Second, Clay with Gibril Diarra getting the victory 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4).
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gibril Diarra | 3 |
| Matteo Fago | 0 |
Italy F12(28-04-2014)
6
7
6
4
7
6
| Diarra | Stats | Fago |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
| 3 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
| Ret. | Ranking | Ret. |
| 594 | Highest Rank | 667 |
| 34 | Age | 37 |
| R | Plays | - |
| 1 | Titles | 0 |
| 46% (203-243) | Career Total W/L | 48% (111-121) |
| $710 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 3 | Clay H2H | 0 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Cerundolo VS Aliassime PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Popyrin VS Bublik PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
25 Apr 2025 / Second
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-7(5) 6-4 7-6(4) | |||||
| 6-4 7-6(1) | |||||
| 7-6(5) 6-4 | |||||
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 45 | Games Won | 37 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 0:0:0 | Average Match Time | 0:0:0 |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 2nd Serve Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Return Points Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 75% (3/4) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 25% (1/4) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Gibril Diarra Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 0-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats 
Pietro Rondoni
Player
Gibril Diarra
59%
(
57 of
97)
1st Serve %
73%
(
73 of
100)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
43 of
73)
60%
(
24 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
17%
(
2 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
34 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
40 of
100)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
7-6(5) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matvey Minin
Player
Gibril Diarra
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
37 of
58)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
27 of
45)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
48%
(
13 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
32 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Gibril Diarra
Player
Karlo Krolo
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
66%
(
31 of
47)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Gibril Diarra
Player
Kaiwei Wang
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
5
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
15 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Costin Paval
Player
Gibril Diarra
61%
(
25 of
41)
1st Serve %
64%
(
28 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
13 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Gorazd Srbljak
Player
Gibril Diarra
76%
(
81 of
107)
1st Serve %
72%
(
84 of
117)
7
Aces
7
0
Double Faults
8
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
56 of
84)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
35%
(
37 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
47 of
117)
117
Total Points Won
107
|
7-6(1) 5-7 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gibril Diarra
Player
Carlo Alberto Fossati
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
49%
(
30 of
61)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
13 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Matteo Fago Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Gianluca Di Nicola
Player
Matteo Fago
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
64%
(
39 of
61)
1
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
1
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
39%
(
14 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
45%
(
39 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
79
Total Points Won
69
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Gianluca Acquaroli
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve %
45%
(
21 of
47)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
2
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
45%
(
28 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Yannick Hanfmann
Player
Matteo Fago
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Leon Hoeveler
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Juan Pablo Paz
Player
Matteo Fago
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
78)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
39 of
78)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Davide Galoppini
53%
(
54 of
101)
1st Serve %
58%
(
65 of
113)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
36 of
65)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
40%
(
40 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
53 of
113)
114
Total Points Won
100
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Tsung-Hua Yang
49%
(
37 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
51 of
79)
4
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
10 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
82
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(2) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Matteo Fago
54%
(
28 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Federico Bonacia
56%
(
45 of
81)
1st Serve %
53%
(
49 of
93)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
17 of
44)
64%
(
9 of
14)
Break Points Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
49%
(
40 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
52 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
81
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Fago
Player
Riccardo Sinicropi
55%
(
46 of
83)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
18 of
46)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
30 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
83)
89
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46% (203/243) | Win/Loss | 48% (111/121) |
| 47% (481/532) | Sets Win/Loss | 49% (263/276) |
| 50% (4841/4863) | Games Win/Loss | 50% (2492/2490) |
| 30% (6/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 71% (25/10) |
| 48% (181/197) | Clay Win/Loss | 44% (83/107) |
| 36% (16/29) | Indoor Hard W/L | 43% (3/4) |
| 0% (0/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.03 |
| 996 | Aces Total | 85 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.05 |
| 921 | Total Double Faults | 122 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 542.08 | Average Opponent Rank | 510.6 |
| 61% (9624/15887) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1646/2649) |
| 69% (6648/9624) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (1049/1646) |
| 48% (3012/6262) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (475/1003) |
| 40% (554/1382) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 50% (127/254) |
| 37% (5779/15620) | Return Points Win % | 42% (1098/2598) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 11% (1/8) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 38% (23/37) | Challenger W/L | 38% (10/16) |
| 47% (179/198) | Futures W/L | 49% (101/105) |
| 46% (202/435) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (110/231) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 42% (62/146) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (22/52) |
| 44% (58/132) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (33/74) |
| 81% (217/175) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (112/92) |
| 19% (217/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (112/20) |
| 12% (227/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (120/19) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
